Brazil vs Serbia: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social
Brazil
57.6%
in 2022
Serbia
55.3%
in 2022
Brazil rank
2nd
Serbia rank
3rd
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social over time
- Brazil
- Serbia
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 57.6% against 55.3% in Serbia, a difference of 2.3%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 2nd and Serbia ranks 3rd of 34 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 44.9% | 41.8% | 3.0% | Brazil |
| 2020s | 55.6% | 52.0% | 3.5% | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social, Brazil or Serbia?
- Brazil, at 57.6% against 55.3% in Serbia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social between Brazil and Serbia?
- 2.3%, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Serbia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2022.
- How do Brazil and Serbia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social?
- Brazil ranks 2nd and Serbia ranks 3rd of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Assistance -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group