Bolivia vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social
Bolivia
26.3%
in 2021
Kyrgyzstan
27.1%
in 2020
Bolivia rank
16th
Kyrgyzstan rank
15th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social over time
- Bolivia
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 27.1% against 26.3% in Bolivia, a difference of 0.8%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Bolivia ahead.
Bolivia ranks 16th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 15th of 34 countries.
Bolivia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 56.8% | 20.3% | 36.6% | Bolivia |
| 2010s | 33.8% | 20.7% | 13.0% | Bolivia |
| 2020s | 28.9% | 27.1% | 1.8% | Bolivia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social, Bolivia or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 27.1% against 26.3% in Bolivia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social between Bolivia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.8%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
- How do Bolivia and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social?
- Bolivia ranks 16th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 15th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Assistance -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group