Belarus vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social
Belarus
29.7%
in 2019
Kyrgyzstan
27.1%
in 2020
Belarus rank
12th
Kyrgyzstan rank
15th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social over time
- Belarus
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 29.7% against 27.1% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 2.6%.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 12th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 15th of 34 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social, Belarus or Kyrgyzstan?
- Belarus, at 29.7% against 27.1% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social between Belarus and Kyrgyzstan?
- 2.6%, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Kyrgyzstan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social?
- Belarus ranks 12th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 15th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Assistance -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group