Belarus vs Ecuador: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social
Belarus
29.7%
in 2019
Ecuador
33.2%
in 2022
Belarus rank
12th
Ecuador rank
11th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social over time
- Belarus
- Ecuador
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 33.2% against 29.7% in Belarus, a difference of 3.5%.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Ecuador ahead.
Belarus ranks 12th and Ecuador ranks 11th of 34 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Ecuador in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 23.5% | 32.9% | 9.3% | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 38.5% | 29.1% | 9.4% | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social, Belarus or Ecuador?
- Ecuador, at 33.2% against 29.7% in Belarus as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social between Belarus and Ecuador?
- 3.5%, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Ecuador?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Ecuador rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social?
- Belarus ranks 12th and Ecuador ranks 11th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Assistance -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group