Belarus vs Costa Rica: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social
Belarus
29.7%
in 2019
Costa Rica
29.2%
in 2022
Belarus rank
12th
Costa Rica rank
13th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social over time
- Belarus
- Costa Rica
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 29.7% against 29.2% in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Belarus ranks 12th and Costa Rica ranks 13th of 34 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Costa Rica in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Costa Rica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 23.5% | 47.4% | 23.8% | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 38.5% | 29.0% | 9.5% | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social, Belarus or Costa Rica?
- Belarus, at 29.7% against 29.2% in Costa Rica as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social between Belarus and Costa Rica?
- 0.5%, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Costa Rica?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Costa Rica rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social?
- Belarus ranks 12th and Costa Rica ranks 13th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Assistance -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group