Ecuador vs Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social
Ecuador
25.8%
in 2022
Mongolia
25.6%
in 2020
Ecuador rank
17th
Mongolia rank
18th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social over time
- Ecuador
- Mongolia
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 25.8% against 25.6% in Mongolia, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 17th and Mongolia ranks 18th of 35 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 25.6% | 19.9% | 5.8% | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 27.5% | 25.6% | 1.9% | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social, Ecuador or Mongolia?
- Ecuador, at 25.8% against 25.6% in Mongolia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social between Ecuador and Mongolia?
- 0.2%, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Mongolia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Ecuador and Mongolia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social?
- Ecuador ranks 17th and Mongolia ranks 18th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Assistance (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group