Ecuador vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social
Ecuador
25.8%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
26.4%
in 2020
Ecuador rank
17th
Kyrgyzstan rank
16th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social over time
- Ecuador
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 26.4% against 25.8% in Ecuador, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 17th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 16th of 35 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 24.8% | 25.4% | 0.6% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 27.5% | 26.4% | 1.0% | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social, Ecuador or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 26.4% against 25.8% in Ecuador as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social between Ecuador and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.6%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Kyrgyzstan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Ecuador and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social?
- Ecuador ranks 17th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 16th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Assistance (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group