Chile vs Panama: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social
Chile
38.0%
in 2022
Panama
33.4%
in 2023
Chile rank
10th
Panama rank
12th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social over time
- Chile
- Panama
How they compare
Chile currently reports 38.0% against 33.4% in Panama, a difference of 4.6%.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Panama's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 10th and Panama ranks 12th of 35 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Panama in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 26.1% | 20.1% | 5.9% | Chile |
| 2010s | 20.7% | 29.9% | 9.2% | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social, Chile or Panama?
- Chile, at 38.0% against 33.4% in Panama as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social between Chile and Panama?
- 4.6%, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Panama?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2017.
- How do Chile and Panama rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social?
- Chile ranks 10th and Panama ranks 12th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Assistance (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group